Signatures 731 total
-
1
Name: SJ Avery on May 21, 2009Comments: The SCA also fails to realize that the old PS 133 is an architectural anchor for the community
-
2
Name: Reiko Tahara on May 21, 2009Comments: Yes, the beautiful cherished building and the garden should be saved!!
-
3
Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
4
Name: Annabelle Gay Reboli on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
5
Name: Eric Denny on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
6
Name: Paul Sweet on May 22, 2009Comments: Baltic St. resident and Community Gardener
-
7
Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
8
Name: Julie Claire Derscheid on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
9
Name: Lizette Cruz on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
10
Name: Richard Haw on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
11
Name: Roberto Jeanniton on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
12
Name: Luis Cruz on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
13
Name: Meredith Mendelsohn on May 22, 2009Comments: This is a premature project with many details still unclear.
-
14
Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2009Comments: We must start being more protective of our architectural history. Demolishing this is tragic and needless, and ignores the wants of the community.
-
15
Name: JF Tolbert on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
16
Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2009Comments: With so much asphalt and so little green space, each small square of dirt that is actually being used to grow food, flowers, trees, etc. should be considered a human necessity. There must be other options considered before taking away something that makes it possible to be connected to the earth in this urban environment. Even the president of the United States has realized how important gardens are, as one was jus planted on the white house grounds.
-
17
Name: Maisie Todd on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
18
Name: Greg Emmanuel on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
19
Name: Sean Roberts on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
20
Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
21
Name: Patricia Reed on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
22
Name: Ari Korner on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
23
Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
24
Name: Christopher Moisan on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
25
Name: David Kimelman on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
26
Name: Robert Rosenberg on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
27
Name: Barbara Ann Rogers on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
28
Name: Charles Wells on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
29
Name: Briar Sauro on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
30
Name: Jackie Lenox on May 22, 2009Comments: please save this lovely building from demolition! The only beautiful thing on 4th avenue and you want to take it down insanity!
-
31
Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
32
Name: Rea Tajiri on May 22, 2009Comments: It is always a necessity to hear from the community before imposing a structure into their domain that will directly impact their quality of life including possible environmental contamination. I have been hearing about this wonderful garden from my friend who works in it and keeps a small plot there with her daughter. This is a thriving commnity resource along with the historic schoolhouse. Please reconsider moving the new schoolhouse to a more reasonable location that does not endanger the community and displace a valuable community resource.
-
33
Name: Deborah Howard on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
34
Name: Dimitrea Tokunbo on May 22, 2009Comments: I live in Brooklyn and preserving history, beauty and "aliveness" for our children (and ourselves) is important to me.
-
35
Name: Don Quinn Kelley on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
36
Name: Eleni Beja on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
37
Name: Lou Giansante on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
38
Name: Rachel Benoff on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
39
Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2009Comments: There is no way you will ever be able to rebuild anything as beautiful as that building.
-
40
Name: Jeremy Kim on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
41
Name: Maria Cutrona on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
42
Name: MaríLia Albornoz on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
43
Name: Robert Murtha on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
44
Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2009Comments:
-
45
Name: Christine Hagen on May 22, 2009Comments: Shame on whoever made the decision to tear down one of the few beautiful buildings and green spaces on 4th Avenue....and trying to do it on the sly at that! I hope this can be stopped. There are always ways of modernizing and updating without destroying the beauty that already exists!
-
46
Name: Christine Hagen on May 22, 2009Comments: Shame on whoever made the decision to tear down one of the few beautiful buildings and green spaces on 4th Avenue....and trying to do it on the sly at that! I hope this can be stopped. There are always ways of modernizing and updating without destroying the beauty that already exists!
-
47
Name: Suzanne Spellen on May 22, 2009Comments: Why is destruction the first and only option in this city. This is a well built, functional school, rich in local and architectural history and beauty. Please look at alternate plans that can preserve it, AND built needed facilities for our kids.
-
48
Name: Liz Heck on May 22, 2009Comments: This is ridiculous! There is no need to tear this building down.
-
49
Name: Michael Choi on May 22, 2009Comments: The city talks about being green all the time but does not put its message into use. Adaptive re-use of architecturally significant building is the ultimate way to be green in the city and it helps keep the history of the community. Demolition is only a solution for the uninspired.
-
50
Name: Samantha Bennett on May 22, 2009Comments: