Save 4th Ave Park Slope Landmark and Community Garden

Signatures 784 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 16 › »

1. 1
   Name: SJ Avery on May 21, 2009

   Comments: The SCA also fails to realize that the old PS 133 is an architectural anchor for the community

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Reiko Tahara on May 21, 2009

   Comments: Yes, the beautiful cherished building and the garden should be saved!!

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Annabelle Gay Reboli on May 22, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Eric Denny on May 22, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Paul Sweet on May 22, 2009

   Comments: Baltic St. resident and Community Gardener

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Julie Claire Derscheid on May 22, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Lizette Cruz on May 22, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Richard Haw on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Roberto Jeanniton on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Luis Cruz on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Meredith Mendelsohn on May 22, 2009

    Comments: This is a premature project with many details still unclear.

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2009

    Comments: We must start being more protective of our architectural history. Demolishing this is tragic and needless, and ignores the wants of the community.

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: JF Tolbert on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2009

    Comments: With so much asphalt and so little green space, each small square of dirt that is actually being used to grow food, flowers, trees, etc. should be considered a human necessity. There must be other options considered before taking away something that makes it possible to be connected to the earth in this urban environment. Even the president of the United States has realized how important gardens are, as one was jus planted on the white house grounds.

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Maisie Todd on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Greg Emmanuel on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Sean Roberts on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Patricia Reed on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Ari Korner on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Christopher Moisan on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: David Kimelman on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Robert Rosenberg on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Barbara Ann Rogers on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Charles Wells on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Briar Sauro on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Jackie Lenox on May 22, 2009

    Comments: please save this lovely building from demolition! The only beautiful thing on 4th avenue and you want to take it down insanity!

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Rea Tajiri on May 22, 2009

    Comments: It is always a necessity to hear from the community before imposing a structure into their domain that will directly impact their quality of life including possible environmental contamination. I have been hearing about this wonderful garden from my friend who works in it and keeps a small plot there with her daughter. This is a thriving commnity resource along with the historic schoolhouse. Please reconsider moving the new schoolhouse to a more reasonable location that does not endanger the community and displace a valuable community resource.

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Deborah Howard on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Dimitrea Tokunbo on May 22, 2009

    Comments: I live in Brooklyn and preserving history, beauty and "aliveness" for our children (and ourselves) is important to me.

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Don Quinn Kelley on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Eleni Beja on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Lou Giansante on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Rachel Benoff on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2009

    Comments: There is no way you will ever be able to rebuild anything as beautiful as that building.

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Jeremy Kim on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Maria Cutrona on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Marília Albornoz on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Robert Murtha on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Anonymous on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Christine Hagen on May 22, 2009

    Comments: Shame on whoever made the decision to tear down one of the few beautiful buildings and green spaces on 4th Avenue....and trying to do it on the sly at that! I hope this can be stopped. There are always ways of modernizing and updating without destroying the beauty that already exists!

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Christine Hagen on May 22, 2009

    Comments: Shame on whoever made the decision to tear down one of the few beautiful buildings and green spaces on 4th Avenue....and trying to do it on the sly at that! I hope this can be stopped. There are always ways of modernizing and updating without destroying the beauty that already exists!

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Suzanne Spellen on May 22, 2009

    Comments: Why is destruction the first and only option in this city. This is a well built, functional school, rich in local and architectural history and beauty. Please look at alternate plans that can preserve it, AND built needed facilities for our kids.

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Liz Heck on May 22, 2009

    Comments: This is ridiculous! There is no need to tear this building down.

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Michael Choi on May 22, 2009

    Comments: The city talks about being green all the time but does not put its message into use. Adaptive re-use of architecturally significant building is the ultimate way to be green in the city and it helps keep the history of the community. Demolition is only a solution for the uninspired.

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Samantha Bennett on May 22, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 16 › »