Say No to River Ridge Farms

Signatures 105 total

Page: 1, 2, 3

1. 1
   Name: Graham Russell on Mar 29, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Edy Johnston on Mar 29, 2008

   Comments: We don't another Spring Hill.

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Mike Welch on Mar 30, 2008

   Comments: this planning comm is going against what they have already put in place and more importantly against what the people of thompsons station want

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Steven R Wright on Mar 30, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Ginger Wright on Mar 30, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Jenny Hockett on Mar 31, 2008

   Comments: I say a big "NO" because this area on Thompson Station Rd. West should be left "as is". We're taking away too much of our country side and I thought that this area was to be left to building lots of 5 acres or more. This road can hardly stand the traffic it has now. Please say NO.

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Andrew Ramer on Apr 2, 2008

   Comments: Can't believe TS is throwing up just another dense neighborhood. Why not 5 acre lots when and where is the meeting

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Steve Hockett on Apr 3, 2008

   Comments: Pease reject River Ridge Farms Development proposal We want to limit growth on the west side of 31w and can't stand any more traffic in the area.

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Tiffany on Apr 3, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Ron Barrett on Apr 3, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Ashley Johnston on Apr 4, 2008

    Comments: Why build in such a small old town At least keep thompson's station open.

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Brian Parnell on Apr 5, 2008

    Comments: No to more traffic, no to more urban sprawl, and no to the city abandoning the principles by which we elected them to govern us by.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Lisa K. Parnell on Apr 5, 2008

    Comments: This will be disastrous to the rural essence of our community. Mayor and Alderman please VOTE NO!!

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Mark Parnell on Apr 5, 2008

    Comments: Vote No Please.

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Andrew Parnell on Apr 5, 2008

    Comments: Vote NO.

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Sheryl Lewis on Apr 5, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Dawn Harrison on Apr 5, 2008

    Comments: This is made for low density - I don't see how 1/3 or 1/5 of an acre lot is low intensity. I would like to see this area remain rural and not lose the distinction of what makes Thompson's Station - Thompson's Station vs chaos. It's shameful that are politicans would sell out and go back on their promises. Sadly Money Talks. Thanks for Mille Halvorson - I'll remember her name during the next election. NOT HAPPY!

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Tim Harrison on Apr 5, 2008

    Comments: I'm subject to 5 acre minimum. I can see this land from my house. How can they put a house on 1/3 or 1/5 of an acre. Maybe I should rezone my property and sell off too and cash in. Totally Against Rezoning of This Property........ Green Acres is the place to be. Farm living is the life for me. Land spreading so far and wide. Keep Spring Hill but give me that countryside.

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Ron And Rita Maggi on Apr 5, 2008

    Comments: We moved to the country because we where told in meetings of the Thompson's Station officials that it would remain country based upon the citizen's vote; this now being ignored. Seems that the officials feel that the $$$ is more important than the people's rights. Through our taxes we pay to have our opinions heard and not ignored. We, the people, are, in this nation, the employers of the town officials. Our decisions are final. Democracy!!!

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Ron And Rita Maggi on Apr 5, 2008

    Comments: We moved to the country because we where told in meetings of the Thompson's Station officials that it would remain country based upon the citizen's vote; this now being ignored. Seems that the officials feel that the $$$ is more important than the people's rights. Through our taxes we pay to have our opinions heard and not ignored. We, the people, are, in this nation, the employers of the town officials. Our decisions are final. Democracy!!!

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Dianne Roberts on Apr 5, 2008

    Comments: Do not zone T.S. Rd. W. for high density development. We are not against development but this shows a total lack of concern for the input from 2 years ago.

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Susan Williams on Apr 5, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Becky Ramer on Apr 6, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Carole Fazio on Apr 6, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Carole Fazio on Apr 6, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Robert (Tim) West on Apr 7, 2008

    Comments: Why are we considering another developement that appears to run contrary to the many stated objections of citizens and promises by elected officials

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Robert (Tim) West on Apr 7, 2008

    Comments: Why are we considering another developement that appears to run contrary to the many stated objections of citizens and promises by elected officials

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Jason Chaffin on Apr 7, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Tammy Goolsby on Apr 7, 2008

    Comments: I oppose the proposed development

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Julie Costa-Bickmore on Apr 7, 2008

    Comments: Deny approval!

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Alisa Fording on Apr 7, 2008

    Comments: With to much growth comes without proper planning we will have a mess on our hands! As is Spring Hill has not planned with the infrastructure and it's a mess to get around in! People won't want to stay if you get it such a mess!

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: John J. Sweigert on Apr 7, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Warrington on Apr 8, 2008

    Comments: If we wanted to live in a highly populated subdivision we would of bought into one. People in this area pay high dollar for their land to get away from that!!!

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: James And Melanie Fryman on Apr 8, 2008

    Comments: I just moved to Thompson's Station for the rural setting, and purposely stayed away from Spring Hill and the small lots of suburbia. I do not want to see the town I carefully researched for my first house turn into a suburb.

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Bobbi Bean on Apr 9, 2008

    Comments: If these type of projects keep going on, soon Thompson's Station will have no farm land and will look just like Spring Hill. That day will be a VERY sad one.

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Joshua B. Norman on Apr 9, 2008

    Comments: I have lived in the Burwood community all of my life. I have watched Thompson's Station grow from the BP and Sale Barn to what it is now. Also, Spring Hill has exploded as well. It saddens me to see what is happening to an area that at one point was fields and farms.

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Stephanie Todd on Apr 9, 2008

    Comments: PLEASE, don't allow Thompsons Station to get out of control as Spring Hill has.

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Tyler Clark on Apr 9, 2008

    Comments: No more huge subdivisions

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Laurel Walsh on Apr 10, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Laurel Walsh on Apr 10, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Kyle Peek on Apr 10, 2008

    Comments: Don't let it happen....

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Miki Peek on Apr 10, 2008

    Comments: Stop the building..

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Angela Hawkins on Apr 11, 2008

    Comments: No more rezoning! We do not need anymore homes or Targets!! Keep the farm land! If it is for sell at least make a park out of it! People want open beaufiful land!!!!!!

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Dolly Linkous on Apr 11, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Kevin Linkous on Apr 11, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Laura Goin on Apr 11, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Hollie Fisher on Apr 11, 2008

    Comments: My husband and I moved to Thompson's Station for the sole fact that it is a small, family oriented city. We both feel as though approval of the River View Farms Development would overpopulate this wonderful, homey city. We live right behind the said property. It makes our day each time we drive by and see the beautiful land. We can't imagine seeing home after home instead of the adorable cows. Please don't let Thompson's Station lose its small town appeal to families such as us.

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Amy Sturm on Apr 12, 2008

    Comments: I have lived in Williiamson County my whole life, 37 years; I take pride in all that this county has to offer; part of that being our rural areas . Growth around this area is occuring at an astonishing rate at some point we have to say enough. People flock to this county for it's great schools and small town feel. If we allow this development to go up in Thompson's Station the we lose so very much. We become just another county who sold out to the highest bidder. I understand that we must have growth but I also understand there has to be balance. And right now the scale is leaning heavely to development.

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Kimberly Hartnett on Apr 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Scott Eller on Apr 13, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3