Skip to main content

The proposal for the St. Margarets site has been officially rejected by the planning authorities. This outcome reflects the commitment of those who recognized how such a heavy burden would compromise our town. We remain grateful for the concern you showed throughout this process and will continue to observe future …

March 25, 2008

Housing Development Epping

Housing Development Epping

🏆 Won — 188 supporters Verified

Final supporters

S
Someone
R
reginald f.
S
Someone
A
andrew m.
K
kelly c.
A
Alan B.
A
Angela G.
S
Sarah Y.
S
Someone
N
nik g.
+178 more
Started by Anonymous 18 years, 8 months ago
The proposal for 351 New Dwellings on the Site of St.Margarets Hospital Epping will bea catastrophe for the whole town. 351 homes means approx 700 more people + children. Approximately 300 plus more motor vehicles all in a very tight area. The traffic in Epping is already very heavy with congestion in the High Street most of the working day Parking is almost impossible. The extra demands on medical services, transport, schools and utilities would make their load unbearable.Please indicate your opposition to this disastrous plan by signing the petition

Updates

Reached 100 supporters

March 2, 2008

8 Comments

P
Paul Murphy
18 years ago Featured

Too many houses. Too much traffic. Epping cant take it.

L
Linda Schwartz
18 years ago Featured

NO WAY! Traffic is bad enough on the High St. They will ruin the town.

M
Mark Wells
18 years ago Featured

The doctors and schools are full. Where are these 700 people meant to go? Stop the greed.

S
Sarah Rahman
18 years ago Featured

Epping is already gridlocked. Trying to get to the station is a nightmare as it is. Adding 300 more cars is just asking for a total disaster.

D
Dave Espinoza
18 years ago Featured

Infrastructure is already at breaking point. We need to look after the locals not just build houses for profit.

J
Julie Morgan
18 years ago Featured

St Margarets is a historical site and shouldnt be turned into a cramped housing estate. Think about the local residents for once.

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

No to the estate

R
reginald faram
11 years ago

a bg no