205 Magee Ave. Application

Signatures 181 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4 › »

1. 101
   Name: John Giddings on Jan 30, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Jack & Barbara Leydon on Jan 30, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Jack Csenge on Jan 30, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Nancy Kaseta on Jan 30, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: P E Czescik on Jan 30, 2013

   Comments: Our family was waiting for that park to open...We don't live on the water but love to get as close as possible when we want to .

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Mark V Mckeon on Jan 31, 2013

   Comments: Lets keep the boat yard where it's properly zone for it already! The south end near Dyke lane where we have ALWAYS had our boat yard in Stamford.

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Peter Fiorita on Jan 31, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: James McKee on Jan 31, 2013

   Comments: it is an absolute disgrace that the mayor and gov. are in the pocket of these developers.

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Harriet & Randy Dinter on Jan 31, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Steve Pressler on Jan 31, 2013

    Comments: I oppose

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Steven Palmer on Jan 31, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Jay Cassella on Jan 31, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Dianne Daddona on Jan 31, 2013

    Comments: On top of that, it looks like there is no room for sailboats. Providing only for power boats certainly doesn't respect the heritage of boat building and repair that belongs with the 14 acre piece that was to be kept as a boatyard in perpetuity.

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Dianne Daddona on Jan 31, 2013

    Comments: On top of that, it looks like there is no room for sailboats. Providing only for power boats certainly doesn't respect the heritage of boat building and repair, and sailboat owners, that historically belongs with the 14 acre piece that was to be kept as a boatyard in perpetuity.

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Paul Daddona on Jan 31, 2013

    Comments: On top of that, it looks like there is no room for sailboats. Providing only for power boats certainly doesn't respect the heritage of boat building and repair, and sailboat owners, that historically belongs with the 14 acre piece that was to be kept as a boatyard in perpetuity

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: David Winston on Jan 31, 2013

    Comments: Any attempt to relocate the boatyard is a disservice to our boating heritage. Another office building on shore front property is simply a misuse of a natural resource. Let's stick to our original intended uses for long Island Sound.

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Ann Davies on Jan 31, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Peter Carlson on Jan 31, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Constance Carlson on Jan 31, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Frank Cook on Feb 1, 2013

    Comments: this yard is only capable of small boat use where as the majority of boats are considerably larger than the proposed yard can handle. I can not see them rack storing 40+ foot sail boats or any boat with a keel.

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Philip Gussack on Feb 1, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Heather Sclafani on Feb 1, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Marc O on Feb 2, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Ann & Larry Cece on Feb 3, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: ROBERT LAMMIE on Feb 3, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: John McConaghy on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: I live at Harbor House, 43 Harbor Dr. and strongly oppose the proposed boatyard construction. Sandra Ussery Unit 103

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Marikay Mead Willson on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Sandy Ussery on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: This would be a huge mistake for the entire community here in Shippan, especially at Harbor House

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Maureen Carson on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: I walk this park and boardwalk almost daily with my dogs. I am opposed to loss of park space for a boatyard that is clearly designated to be in the former space off Bateman Way.

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Jacolyn A. Connolly on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: It is time to stop those who flaunt the law in the face of law-abiding citizens. This so-called boatyard will not meet the needs of boaters and will greatly increase traffic into our residential area.

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Penney Burnett on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Diane Deegan on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: Please do not allow a boat yard on Magee Ave.

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Penney Burnett on Feb 5, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Sandra Van Wachem on Feb 5, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 5, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Barbara LeCornec on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Stephen Petri on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments: This was the last working boatyard in Stamford. The Magee property is a joke. This is the second time it was supposed to be a yard.

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Molly Carson on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: John Owen on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: David Tunick on Feb 18, 2013

    Comments: I'm a Stamford Shippan resident/voter with a real need for an appropriate boating storage and service facility, but this is not it.

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: Dorothy Fichtel on Feb 18, 2013

    Comments: Gov Malloy is again using "It's my way or the highway!" attitude. Save the 14 acre boat yard site for BOATS ! NOT Hedge funds!!!!

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Capt. Henry E. Marx on Feb 18, 2013

    Comments: This is a fine site for Rack Storage - assuming there is a need for it in Stamford Harbor. It is my understanding that Norwalk has Rack Storage and it is not near full!? However, it is totally inadequate fas a "replacement" for the Brewer Yard.

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Bev Marx on Feb 18, 2013

    Comments: This is not a replacement yard - it is totally inadeqaute for the requirements.

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Janice Cook on Feb 18, 2013

    Comments: I am the owner of a sail boat and this facility will not provide any sevices that I can use. Therefor it is not required and only a ploy to circumvent the requirements of BLT zoning requirements.I and many othe sailboat owners feel the same.

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: David Isaacs on Feb 18, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: David Tunick on Feb 18, 2013

    Comments: I'm a Stamford/Shippan resident and voter. Stamford needs a marine storage and maintenance facility badly, not least of which for quality of life, but the proposal for Magee Avenue is not the answer for many reasons.

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: David Tunick on Feb 18, 2013

    Comments: I'm a Stamford/Shippan resident and voter. Stamford needs a marine storage and maintenance facility badly, not least of which for quality of life, but the proposal for Magee Avenue is not the answer for many reasons.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4 › »