Signatures 181 total
-
51
Name: Ron Monticone on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
52
Name: Ron Monticone on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
53
Name: Myles Scherr on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
54
Name: Robert Gisolfi on Jan 30, 2013Comments: The site is inadequate! Stamford Harbor is a major pleasure boating and commercial use waterway on the LI Sound. It is a disgrace that the city cannot design a state of the art marina at the old Brewers location with full service facilities and an actual fuel dock - not makeshift. We currently don't even have adequate facilities for law enforcement or the coast guard! It takes vision and a backbone to run a city like Stamford, and it seems like the current government have neither. BLT is making all the decisions!!Flag
-
55
Name: Bernard Armstrong on Jan 30, 2013Comments: This is a real tradjedy for Stamford not only to loose a major boatyard and have the twon try to stuff the boaters in thi small space and worse to desecrate the property with the Bilgewater Hedge fund. What are mess for our coastal footprintFlag
-
56
Name: Nadia Fiorita on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
57
Name: Anonymous on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
58
Name: Charles Weiner on Jan 30, 2013Comments: Please stop this before it is too lateFlag
-
59
Name: Anonymous on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
60
Name: Holly Anger on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
61
Name: Steven P Gospodinoff on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
62
Name: Charles Weiner on Jan 30, 2013Comments: Please stop this before it is too late !! Pavia and Malloy will not be re-elected.. Stop this until we can get them out of office !!!!Flag
-
63
Name: Marc Faubel on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
64
Name: Lynn Weiner on Jan 30, 2013Comments: From reports in the Advocate we can see that BLT is not an honorable company. It seems they have the mayor and gov in their deep pockets.Flag
-
65
Name: John Scagnelli on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
66
Name: Foxhall A. Parker on Jan 30, 2013Comments: The proposed boatyard would in no way be a real replacement for the facility we lost when Yacht Haven West closed.Flag
-
67
Name: Katie DeGabriel on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
68
Name: Maureen Stanley on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
69
Name: Marc Spiro on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
70
Name: Robert Faubel on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
71
Name: H. Theodore Graves on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
72
Name: Chris Anger on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
73
Name: Hugh Sneddon on Jan 30, 2013Comments: I completely oppose the 205 Magee Ave location for the new boat yard.Flag
-
74
Name: Anonymous on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
75
Name: Celine Iodice on Jan 30, 2013Comments: why would you want to do such a thing as get rid of the boatyard,perhapsFlag
-
76
Name: Peter Hubbard on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
77
Name:
CaptSaam Scuba on Jan 30, 2013
Comments:Flag -
78
Name: Anonymous on Jan 30, 2013Comments: the project intrudes on valuable tidal wetlands, and marsh land, which is directly connected to the Sound. Moreover, this property is designated since 2001 to be open public space.Flag
-
79
Name: Hanne J. Nielsen on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
80
Name: Faraday Davies on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
81
Name: William Strong on Jan 30, 2013Comments: Stamford residentFlag
-
82
Name: Kevin Flaherty on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
83
Name: John Dulski on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
84
Name: Anne Cheng on Jan 30, 2013Comments: We need to follow our city's original water use plans! If we could get 3,000 cars into the city, and into the South End, I worry about who will pick up the cost of all those flooded cars in the proposed Bridgewater complex when it floods. Can Bridgewater be told to hold that money in escrow?Flag
-
85
Name: Rolf Maurer on Jan 30, 2013Comments: Corporate interests have too longed trumped the needs of community in Stamford and now it is a matter of basic servicability and public safety.Flag
-
86
Name: Anonymous on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
87
Name: Christine Villani on Jan 30, 2013Comments: This was meant for a park, in addition the space is not large enough for a boatyard, not conducive to the environment of the various homes around it.Flag
-
88
Name:
Doris Albrecht-Gaanderse on Jan 30, 2013
Comments:Flag -
89
Name: Ernest C. Laug on Jan 30, 2013Comments: This land should be used as designated. Park and wetlandsFlag
-
90
Name: Brook C West on Jan 30, 2013Comments: It's has become clear that the Governor and Mayor have not regard for what the people who put them in office want or believe in. When will the Attorney General finally look into all the back room deals that were made by former Mayor, now Governor Malloy ?Flag
-
91
Name: Karen Bocchetta on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
92
Name: Brian Faubel on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
93
Name: Dawn Rogers on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
94
Name: Dawn Rogers on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
95
Name: Arlene Wolfe on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
96
Name: Jane Ellenberg on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
97
Name: Capt. Henry E. Marx on Jan 30, 2013Comments: Additional rack storage for the Harbor would be a good thing. However, this proposal is not a replacement boatyard for boats over 25 ft. and is not fulfilling thier obligation.Flag
-
98
Name: Bryce Davies on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
99
Name: David Isaacs on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag
-
100
Name: Gail Flaster on Jan 30, 2013Comments:Flag