205 Magee Ave. Application

Signatures 181 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4 › »

1. 1
   Name: Maureen Boylan on Jan 28, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Kevin Dailey on Jan 28, 2013

   Comments: This is not a safe spot for a marina to be located. The land was meant to be maintained as parkland. This will destroy that use and the marshland.

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Barbara LeCornec on Jan 28, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Carolyn Goldenberg on Jan 28, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Cynthia Reeder on Jan 29, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 30, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Carol Ann McClean on Jan 30, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Marilyn & John Buckley on Jan 30, 2013

   Comments: Building a boatyard at 205 Magee Ave is wrong. It would not be a good place because you would not have a safe space to put all of the facilities that are needed. The docks would not be safe because of all of the commercial traffic that has to pass through the area.

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Steven Loeb on Jan 30, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: BLT is bad for Connecticut - what happened to our state's debt, Mr. Governor?

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Kelly Di Girolamo on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Alan Lorenzo on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: You cannot provide the same level of service nor accomodate the same size boats in a yard with such a small footprint.

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Tom Senator on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: DON'T LET THIS HAPPEN !! DO WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY AGREED TO !! I oppose the application and construction of a proposed boatyard across park land known as 205 Magee Ave. in Stamford, CT. The property was purchased by the City of Stamford for the sole purpose of establishing additional park land for the Benefit of the Citizens of Stamford and preservation and conservation of tidal wetlands.

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Linda Kramer on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Glenda Blume,Chairman,Waterside Coalition on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: The setback from the channel is less footage than the legal limit.

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: John Josel on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: The restrictive covenants in the deeds conveying property from Wyeth to Waterfont-Magee and the City of Stamford prohibit commercial use on Parcel B on the 205 Magee Site, including the waterfront property necessary for construction of a boatyard.

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: John Josel on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: The restrictions in the deeds conveying Parcel A to Waterfront-Magee and Parcel B to the City of Stamford from Wyeth Holdings, LLC clearly prohibit commercial use on Parcel B including the waterfront property necessary for construction of a boatyard.

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Richmond Mead on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: This boatyard property swap is not a good one for one swap. It will create too much traffic for this part of Shippan. The amount of property swapped is inadequate. The cruise in from the Stamford Harbor Breakwall is way too long for boaters. Boaters now avoid using the Czeik Marina slips because of the lengthy cruise to open waters.

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Dorothy Fichtel on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: Down with BLT !!!

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: William Kuba on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Christopher J. Hynes on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Diane S. Anger on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Colin Costello on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: We need a "REAL BOATYARD" at the old location - not an excuse for one just to satisfy greedy groups..

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: James Percesepe on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: I want a working boat yard at the old brewers site

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Douglas Reid on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: 205 Magee Ave is entirely unsuitable for a boatyard and instead should be a park. My family needs the former site of Brewers Stamford to be restored as a full working boatyard, else we will stop investing our money and time in the Stamford economy.

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Sandy Davies on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Karen Murphy on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: Reasons: (1) The City, BLT and others are proceeding illegally in connection with the approvals for this project. (2) The proposed boatyard will not be able to service large boats. (3) Serious safety issues are involved in taking boats in and out of the water. Also if serve weather conditions develop, what emergency plans are in place? (4) The proposed boatyard makes no sense economically. What will be the cost to store boats and take them in and out of the water 2-3 times a week, mostly on the week-ends during the summer?

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Lawrence McGrath on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Richard David Bruce on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Virginia Halstrom on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Virginia Halstrom on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Chester Koproski on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: I have been an avid boater for over 30 years and strongly rely on a working boatyard for yearly maintenance as well as an emergency haul out due to mechanical failure or natural disaster. It would be a very strong blow to the community if this valuable resource is lost.

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Mark Ryan on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: I support the reopening of the former Brewers boatyard.

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Jeanne Thomson on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Ken Klinefelter on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Richard Keen on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: Magee Ave site NOT suitable

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Patricia Rockhill on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: The culture of developers is that they get what they want, no matter the cost, as long as they can make a buck. In doing so, they often trample the greater good, tempt municipal leaders to corruption, and create public cynicism. The property in question was sold by Collins on the cheap for public use. There is widespread dishonor here; we are ashamed.

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: David C Osler on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: boatyards belong on the point

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Anthony Olmer on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Agi Frimmel on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: No boatyard at 205 Magee Ave.!!!!!!

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Agi Frimmel on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Frank Banta on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Bill Morrell on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Richard F. Anger on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: No way is this location adequate to handle all the boats displaced by the closing of our boat yard. you can't stack 42' boats on racks. I had to store my boat 42' in Stratford, what an inconvenience. I have been a Stamford resident for 29 years. we don't need another office building on the old boat yard site. not one dime in tax assistance. why not fill the whole in the ground downtown?

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Carl Wist on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Judith Slifkin on Jan 30, 2013

    Comments: Magee Ave was never meant to be a boatyard designed to service yachts the size of a Forbes yacht or larger yachts as was Brewers Yacht Haven . Stamford needs a major working boatyard capable of handling and storing all size privately owned boats. It has been our heritage and must remain !

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4 › »