THE NEW EMBLEM FOR LONDON 2012

Signatures 45 total

Page: 1

1. 1
   Name: Stephen Dalton on Jun 5, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Anonymous on Jun 5, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Ian Mclaughlin on Jun 5, 2007

   Comments: yuck

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Andy Gerrity on Jun 5, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Anonymous on Jun 5, 2007

   Comments: typography is awfull. form is terrible. idea is

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Carly Holder on Jun 5, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: James Doyle on Jun 5, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: John Sullivan on Jun 5, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Thomas Day on Jun 5, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Victoria Smith on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Karl Elliott on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments: That logo is a joke!

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Sarah Latham on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments: It is largely ilegible, looks dated already and bears no relation to London.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Claire Nordon on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments: Year to design...absolutely atrocious - imitation as opposed to showing any ingenuity!

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Sophie Murray on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Claire Lewis-smith on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments: it just looks laughably cheap

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Ian Harding on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments: What is that meant to be My 2 year old daughter is a 2012 baby with a promise to be included in the proceedings at the London Olympics. I can't see the thought behind that logo, I could have done that.

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Angus Lewis-Smith on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments: It must be possible to come up with some really attractive, eyecatching logo for a lot less than that! How anyone could justify

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Sue Thomason on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments: Four hundred grand for that! I wouldn't pay four quid for it.

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Karen Williamson on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments: Derivative, confused, dated, repellent

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Iona Lewis-Smtih on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments: I am incredibly dispappointed that this came out of some marketeers to promote the olympics in the UK. As a marketeer myself for a very successful company who's branding is everything, I am shocked that having been given such a unique opportunity to be creative and project flair, all that has come out is some sticklebricks!!! Not acceptable I'm afraid. I work abroad and dread to hear the first foreign comments on the logo...Embarrassing. Get it changed - there's still time!!!

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Tim Hughes on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Michelle Harding on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Ruth Oldham on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments: It is astonishingly bad!

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Nick_mcloughlin@hotmail.com on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 5, 2007

    Comments: good greif

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Neill Hope on Jun 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Alexandra Green on Jun 6, 2007

    Comments: Its truely awful......

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Julia Davies on Jun 6, 2007

    Comments: symbol is horrendous, very bad design.

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Mj Levine on Jun 6, 2007

    Comments: The badly drawn cartoon character on the left (Ken Livingstone) is putting the boot in the groin of the badly drawn cartoon character on the right (every London council tax payer)

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 6, 2007

    Comments: Not inspiring enough, they were trying to be too clever and different, and i think they failed miserably.

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Anuradha Sabherwal on Jun 6, 2007

    Comments: I think the emblem is very poor and ameteurish in graphic impact and is not appropriate for a world event such as the London Olympics. The world deserves better!

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Nhat Le on Jun 6, 2007

    Comments: Does

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: K S Chan on Jun 6, 2007

    Comments: poor design, 400,000 badly spent, if I was not told what in meant I would be none the wiser

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Huw Harries on Jun 6, 2007

    Comments: Absolute tat!

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Emma Askew on Jun 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Emma Askew on Jun 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 6, 2007

    Comments: Garbage, absolutely embarrasing!

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Lisa Haghir on Jun 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 6, 2007

    Comments: has nothing to relate to london specifically

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 6, 2007

    Comments: As a designer, I am not impressed with this in any of its forms. It is neither sophisticated nor light-hearted and certainly not memorable from a design standpoint.

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Niaz Ahmed on Jun 7, 2007

    Comments: Im a South African Architect , i have been working in London for th epast 3 years...... i dont feel the logo is worthy of an amazing place that is london.....

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Fay Cuthbertson on Jun 8, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1