2 Laird Drive

Signatures 204 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »

1. 151
   Name: Torie Steele on Nov 9, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Hope Kearns on Nov 9, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Graham Steele on Nov 9, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Andrew Failes on Nov 10, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 10, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Katharine Lee on Nov 10, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Max on Nov 10, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Brenna Mackenzie on Nov 10, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Stuart Anthony on Nov 10, 2012

   Comments: ridiculous

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Adam Hicks on Nov 10, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Adam Hicks on Nov 10, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Mitchell Steele on Nov 10, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Pat Norton on Nov 11, 2012

    Comments: This site is not zoned the the proposed structure. The official plan is in place for a purpose. Precedent should not be consulted - this proposal should stand or fall on its own merits

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Wilmar Kortleever on Nov 19, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Norah Jackson on Nov 20, 2012

    Comments: not objecting to progress, but am objecting to an 8 story condo that will block the view of existing residents, increase traffic to an already overly busy residential area, and is an grossly inappropriate height and mass for the neighborhood.

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Kathryn Struthers on Nov 21, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Gus Van Den Akker on Nov 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Francesca Colussi, CD on Nov 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Margaret And John Catto on Nov 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Ashley Ho on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Dimi Ntantoulis on Nov 29, 2012

    Comments: Insufficient parking, too large for the area, out of character with residences on street behind

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Ava-Lee Kotler on Nov 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Lea Creswell on Nov 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: The North York Planning Board is obviously not cognizant of the huge carbon foot attached to mammoth projects such as these. I would like to see the Planning Board become acquainted with its mandate; ie, the need to conserve and protect the citizens of Toronto from unwanted and unnecessary development, which is poisoning our air, killing our planet, and destroying every citizen's connection to our neighbourhood.

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Margo Holland on Dec 6, 2012

    Comments: The traffic now is overwhelming sometimes and will certainly be made worse if (as I have heard), a Walmart is built on 2 Laird Drive.

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 10, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Pat Prentice on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 1, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Patricia Prentice on Mar 13, 2013

    Comments: Too big, not well planned

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Bookmaring Service on Mar 14, 2013

    Comments: Q8m4RM Fantastic blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Bookmarks on Mar 14, 2013

    Comments: J2e7N0 Enjoyed every bit of your blog article. Really Great.

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Don Coutts on Mar 17, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Stephen Peirce on Mar 22, 2013

    Comments: City of Toronto, please do not ignore those that speak out and assume that those that don't are in agreement. There is rarely a "silent majority". Apathy perhaps, but not agreement.

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Heather Williamson on Mar 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Jan Sorhaug on Mar 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Erin Sorhaug on Mar 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Patrick Rocca on Mar 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Janine Zimmerman on Mar 23, 2013

    Comments: not wanted!

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Karen Schouten on Mar 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Bob Arsenault on Mar 23, 2013

    Comments: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! Lets just call ourselves Scarborough. Laird Avenue is beginning to look like a trip along Eglinton & Vic Park.

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Robin Dickie on Mar 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Wilmar Kortleever on Mar 23, 2013

    Comments: People signing this petition should also register their opposition to the (alledged) Wal-Mart along Laird. It all sounds like part and parcel of same trend: growth without thinking. Building along roads that are already over capacity - saddling the neighbourhood with all the b.s. And where again are any kids living in these new developments (Scenic on Eglinton, and now 4 more towers along Eglinton west of Brentcliffe?) going to go to school? All schools all around are bursting at the seems - and developers in Toronto are contributing almost nothing to community building - sigh...

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Elaine Snider on Mar 24, 2013

    Comments: Please consider the effect that this application could have on the nearby residents. It will 'scar' their space.

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Graham De Vries on Mar 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Joanna Degez on Mar 27, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Bernice Holman on Mar 28, 2013

    Comments: Please reject the zoning request for 2 Laird Drive. In its present form it will lead to an unacceptable traffic density and have an adverse affect on the community

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Eugene McCarron on Mar 28, 2013

    Comments: I reject the rezoning application for 2 Laird Drive

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Michael Thompson on Apr 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »