2 Laird Drive

Signatures 205 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »

1. 1
   Name: Kathleen McEwan on Oct 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Brenda Berge on Oct 3, 2012

   Comments: I strongly object to the rezoning application.

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Geoff Pollock on Oct 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Meagan Tuck on Oct 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Olivia on Oct 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Keri Vanderland on Oct 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Sydney Vanderland on Oct 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Phillis Christopoulos on Oct 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Monica And Graham De Vries on Oct 4, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 4, 2012

    Comments: Hugely incompatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood.

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Marianne French on Oct 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Elaine Mills on Oct 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Dr. Scott W Girdler on Oct 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Leonardo Marchetti on Oct 4, 2012

    Comments: - A 8-storey building does NOT provide an appropriate transition into the neighbourhood where we have houses. - Privacy a huge issue due to the proximity to the townhouses at Krawchuck. - Noise from many balconies and from garbage collection is also going to be huge problems - Garbage in open space and collection will be problematic as well. - Traffic is going to increase to a point that in unacceptable.

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Carin Moffat on Oct 4, 2012

    Comments: I strongly agree with the above information. A horrible disregard for a well established and beloved neighbourhood.

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Patrick Rocca on Oct 4, 2012

    Comments: this cant happen!!

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Liz Rodrigues on Oct 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Miranda Wilson on Oct 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Mary Jane MacDonald on Oct 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Alison O'Brien-Moran on Oct 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Lucie Fournier on Oct 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Cyndy Rosenthal on Oct 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Evgeniya Pollock on Oct 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Julien LaPointe on Oct 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Sharron Stone on Oct 9, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Deni Papetti on Oct 9, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Nicole Basque on Oct 9, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Olga Glusica on Oct 9, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 10, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Barbara McDiarmid on Oct 10, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Anita Gagnon on Oct 10, 2012

    Comments: When I saw this petition, the 2 Laird Drive address baffled me. I was aware of the redevelopment of the former Post Office site on Malcolm Road. Then I realized that the former Post Office site address had been changed. One can only surmise that the zoning on Laird is advantageous to the developer and out of line with the residential community. This act alone should raise a red flag to the zoning department at the City of Toronto. This intersection is already very congested and additional density would only stress the situation further.This rezoning will set an irreversible precedent. I ask the city to act responsibly and with community safety in mind.

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Margaret Randall on Oct 10, 2012

    Comments: The proposed development is totally out of scale with the neighbourhood. Why not some townhomes?

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Kathryn Mchale on Oct 10, 2012

    Comments: I am very familiar with the setting and context of Laird Drive, as well as Krawchuk Lane and the existing townhouse development there. The proposed new development is utterly out of keeping and context in this very attractive and residential Leaside setting. Further it has a dramatic and disproportionately negative effect upon the Krawchuk Lane townhouses and adjoining neighbours. The benefits of some increased density are modest in proportion to the unnecessary harm that would be done to the character of the community and neighbourhood should the development be approved. I urge city council to reject the proposed development and require the submission of a development proposal that meets the current Official Plan without need for variation.

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Denise Hamilton on Oct 10, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: JoAnn LaPointe on Oct 11, 2012

    Comments: I strongly agree that this request for the current 2 Laird Drive rezoning application be refused.

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Jane Pitfield on Oct 11, 2012

    Comments: I fully support the the request to reject the proposed application for rezoning for 2 Laird Drive.I support the Leaside Community and LPOA by requesting that this application be refused.

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Anne Relyea on Oct 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Gary Relyea on Oct 11, 2012

    Comments: I sympathise with the residents around the 2 Laird who have chosen that neighbourhood for its contact with daylight and limited population density. High rise buildings should be in high rise areas.

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Marlena Malas on Oct 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Marlena Malas on Oct 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Diane Lamb on Oct 11, 2012

    Comments: This rezoning proposal is totally inappropriate for this area of Toronto and I strongly feel this should be refused.

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Brad Lamb on Oct 11, 2012

    Comments: I am strongly opposed to this rezoning proposal and believe the City of Toronto should refuse it.

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Kristin McHale on Oct 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: James Sutcliffe on Oct 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Robyn Peever on Oct 14, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 14, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Alanna on Oct 14, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 14, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »